Tag Archives: North Dakota

Increase in Work-Related Fatal Injuries in 2015 – North Dakota the Highest

According to the Census of Fatal Occupational Injuries, in 2015 the number of work-related fatal injuries increased nationally. There were 4,836 work-related fatal injuries in the United States and 150 work-related fatal injuries in North Carolina compared to 4,821 in 2014.

After the oil-and-gas industry’s sharp increase in work-related fatal injuries in 2014, the industry saw a 38 percent drop in 2015. The occupation with the most reported work-related fatal injuries was “heavy and tractor-trailer truck drivers” with 745. However, logging workers had the highest work-related fatal injury rate at 132.7 per 100,000 workers.

North Dakota reported the highest work-related fatal injury rate at 12.5 per 100,000 workers and Rhode Island recorded the lowest rate at 1.2 per 100,000 workers. North Carolina’s 2015 work-related fatal injury rate was 3.4 per 100,000 workers, with a total of 150 fatalities. In 2014, North Carolina had 137 work-related fatal injuries.

 

2015 Fatal Occupational Injuries Counts and Rates by State of Incident

 

Count

Rate per 100,000 Workers

Alabama

70

3.7

Alaska

14

4.1

Arizona

69

2.4

Arkansas

74

5.8

California

388

2.2

Colorado

75

2.9

Connecticut

44

2.6

Delaware

8

1.9

District of Columbia

8

2.4

Florida

272

3.1

Georgia

180

4.3

Hawaii

18

2.6

Idaho

36

4.8

Illinois

172

2.9

Indiana

115

3.9

Iowa

60

3.9

Kansas

60

4.4

Kentucky

99

5.5

Louisiana

112

5.8

Maine

15

2.5

Maryland

69

2.4

Massachusetts

69

2.1

Michigan

134

3.1

Minnesota

74

2.7

Mississippi

77

6.8

Missouri

117

4.3

Montana

36

7.5

Nebraska

50

5.4

Nevada

44

3.5

New Hampshire

18

2.7

New Jersey

97

2.3

New Mexico

35

4.1

New York

236

2.7

North Carolina

150

3.4

North Dakota

47

12.5

Ohio

202

3.9

Oklahoma

91

5.5

Oregon

44

2.6

Pennsylvania

173

3.0

Rhode Island

6

1.2

South Carolina

117

5.6

South Dakota

21

4.9

Tennessee

112

3.7

Texas

527

4.5

Utah

42

3.2

Vermont

9

2.9

Virginia

106

2.8

Washington

70

2.1

West Virginia

35

5.0

Wisconsin

104

3.6

Wyoming

34

12.0

 

 

 

Total

4,836

3.4

 

 

What About Workers’ Compensation In North Dakota?

Workers have flooded North Dakota to work in the booming oil industry.

Today’s post comes from guest author Jay Causey from Causey Law Firm.

A recent article in the New York Times (An Oil Boom Takes a Toll on Health Care, January 28, 2013) recounted the growing burden on North Dakota hospitals because of on-the-job injuries to workers who have flooded that state to work in the booming oil industry. Apparently North Dakota hospitals are swimming in debt from unpaid bills because, as the article by John Eligon states, “many of the new patients are transient men without health insurance or a permanent address in the area.”

“Swamped by uninsured laborers flocking to dangerous jobs in the oil industry, the hospitals here in the North Dakota oil patch are sinking under skyrocketing debt, a flood of gruesome injuries and bloated business costs from the inflated economy.” – John Eligon, New York Times

Mr. Eligon goes on to discuss actions by the governor and state legislature to increase medical training and medical facilities in North Dakota, and to obtain increased Medicaid financing for the state’s rural hospitals. Not only are medical facilities groaning from the increase of gruesome injuries associated with highly dangerous work environments, Mr. Eligon recounts the health issues that arise from the cramped housing scenarios in the work camps that have sprung up near the oil fields. This includes a significant increase in the incidence of sexually transmitted diseases.

The North Dakota Workforce Safety & Insurance site includes its catchy motto – “Putting Safety to Work.”

However, nowhere in Mr. Eligon’s article is there any mention of, or reference to, North Dakota’s workers compensation system which would seemingly provide the principal coverage for the injuries and conditions that are the subject of his article. Is the NYT oblivious to the fact of coverage for industrial injuries and conditions under each state’s workers compensation law? Or are workers injured in the new booming oil economy of North Dakota somehow being denied coverage under that state’s system, or being engineered out of coverage by the terms of their employment with the oil companies? It seems that a minimal inquiry, at least, on these points was owed by the NYT in its article.

Photo credit: nestor galina / Foter.com / CC BY